~ or how some people are kept useful – but never safe
<- back to Signal
PART I OF 4
Opening
There’s a special kind of anger that doesn’t explode.
It calcifies.
It sharpens.
It learns systems better than the people who own them
This is about that anger.
Capability is not Consent
I have spent a large portion of my life maintaining things I did not own.
Businesses.
Systems.
Infrastructure.
Emotional equilibrium.
Sobriety spaces.
Other people’s comfort.
Not because I was asked nicely.
Because I was capable.
And capability, in this world, is often treated as consent.
The Role Nobody Names
There is a role that exists just below ownership and just above expendability.
You’re not in charge.
But you’re responsible.
You don’t get final say.
But you get final blame.
You don’t control the money.
But you’re expected to protect the asset.
You don’t set the rules.
But somehow, when the rules collapse, everyone looks at you.
That role is called steward — though no one says it out loud, because naming it would imply obligation in the other direction.
The Lie of “Trust”
People love to say:
“We trust you.”
What they usually mean is:
• We don’t want to document this
• We don’t want to formalize it
• We don’t want to give you leverage
• We don’t want to be accountable
Trust, without structure, is not trust.
It’s a cost-saving measure.
And I have learned — painfully, repeatedly — that informal power arrangements always favor the person who can afford to disappear.
Why I Don’t Just Walk Away
Here’s the part people don’t understand.
When you are the steward, you can see the whole system.
You know:
What breaks first
- What fails silently
- Who gets hurt downstream
- How long it takes to recover
So when someone says,
“If you don’t like it, leave”
What they’re really asking is:
“Are you willing to let this burn so we don’t have to change?”
And sometimes the answer is no — not because you’re weak, but because you’re ethical.
That distinction matters.
Ownership Is a Nervous System Issue
This isn’t about ego.
It’s about alignment.
When responsibility and authority line up, the body calms down.
When they don’t:
- Every decision feels dangerous
- Every success increases dependency
- Every failure feels like a personal indictment
People like to call this “intensity” or “borderline” or “control issues.”
No.
This is what happens when a nervous system is forced to stabilize chaos without the tools to resolve it.
The Quiet Rage
Here’s the truth I don’t say out loud very often:
I am not angry because I failed.
I am angry because I succeeded too well in systems that refused to acknowledge what that success cost.
I am angry because stewardship was extracted as a moral resource — compassion, responsibility, care — and never reciprocated structurally.
That kind of anger doesn’t scream.
It documents.
It remembers.
It builds exits.
The Breaking Point isn’t Weakness
Stewardship without ownership always ends the same way.
Burnout.
Conflict.
Or departure framed as betrayal.
And the system will say:
“We don’t know what happened.”
That’s a lie.
What happened is that responsibility finally demanded authority — and the system refused.
It builds exits.
Care is not infinite.
The Breaking Point isn’t Weakness
Competence is not consent.
And love without structure becomes self-harm.
If I am going to steward something now, it will be:
- Explicit
- Documented
- Bounded
- Reciprocal
Anything else is not trust.
It’s exploitation with better manners.
Closing
I still believe in stewardship.
I just no longer believe it should require self-erasure.
If that makes me difficult, so be it.
Difficult is often just the word systems use when they can no longer extract quietly.
Anger, clarified.
Love, with boundaries.
Systems, told the truth.
borderline.miami / signal
| Next →